Perhaps the most anomalous of the three (at least to me) is the religious publisher that makes the anti-religious statements. I wonder what her reasons were for taking the job.

There attempting to ride Lenin’s “locomotive of history” to its “inevitable” destination.
They have mistaken left wing “historicism” for prophetic vision. They don’t argue biblically or historically, or socially or morally.
All there power comes from strained analogies with a non-existent path.

1. Gene Robinson: It comes as no suprise that the "gay civil-rights" icon of the religious left would actually advocate for the deinstitutionalization of marriage. The only suprise is that he would say so in a public forum. So much for "what God hath joined together"... but alas, everything must fall under the anvil of Sodomy, up to and including the church catholic.

2. Martha Simmons: Is she really so historically ignorant that she does not know that it was almost entirely religious people, from right and left, who worked for centuries to end the institution of slavery? What kind of fools does this woman take us for? "You mean it was atheists who fought for the dignity of africans -- and won???" Astounding in its perfect ignorance. Obviously a product of American public schooling.

3. Welton Gaddy: Hitler himself could not have been more succinct in his assessment of the problem. Curing the polluted minds of the unwashed heathens is far too expensive and time-consuming. Best to annihilate them all and start afresh, isn't that right Gaddy?

Just spam, "rolex", or an attempt at silencing debate through spam?