Wesley Smith makes an interesting observation about the spate of state laws that open the way for some of the more controversial types of biotech fiddling:
...under both bills, if the purpose of cloning and implantation is the gestation of a cloned fetus for use in medical experiments or body part harvesting, no law would be broken. ... Moreover, NONE of this year's crop of state legislation intended to legalize therapeutic cloning would place outright bans on implanting cloned embryos into real or artificial wombs. Not one.This can only mean that there is a design and a purpose behind these proposals. The movers and shakers behind these bills want access to cloned fetuses when, technologically, they can be created. In other words, it ain't just about embryonic stem cells anymore.
Surely the just-ending stomach bug, following several sleep-little nights of sick offspring, and the flat tire this morning are affecting my outlook, but I'm beginning to get a feeling of dark inevitability. Note, particularly, the beginning of Smith's final paragraph:
What a story! Yet, it is goes unreported by the mainstream media.
Why does it seem that the made-for-TV controversies that never make it to TV are always those that might serve to wake the public up to the incremental steps toward an unrecognizable society that a handful of people are forcing on us all?
Posted by Justin Katz at March 15, 2005 8:44 PMMe too on that inevitability feeling, Justin. It really hit me yesterday (before I read your post!) and I was going to write on it today ... I really don't think the ESCR/cloning debate is winnable. I actually do think we can protect marriage in this country and even overturn Roe someday to result in drastic reductions in the number of abortions in America. But cloning has too many advocates and practitioners going ahead and working behind the scenes (and even in public) all over the world, with too little public awareness of what's going on. Unhappy days.
Posted by: Kimberly at March 16, 2005 8:56 AMI oscillate between pessimism and optimism on this issue myself. It is certainly true that the biotechnology research complex is pushing ahead at a breakneck speed, which, when combined with widespread scientific illiteracy, makes for a toxic combination. But I often think that someone is going to go too far, or a series of events will eventually push the issue into the mainstream, where there will be a backlash against the biotech true believers. Perhaps that will have its own downsides, but it will probably serve to slow down the juggernaut. I will not be surprised if there is a big backlash against the California stem cell initiative. The taxpayers handed a pot of gold to a handful of researchers, but if they don't produce medical marvels, the people will feel gypped.
Posted by: Mike S. at March 16, 2005 12:25 PMI guess it kind of parallels the nuclear physicists claims that they continuously need bigger and faster atom smashers to prove the existence of ever more sub-atomic particles... which will then lead to the need for another even bigger and faster atom smasher... eventually they will reach the limit of the European coastline and have to move it all to Africa, then to Asia.
Posted by: smmtheory at March 21, 2005 12:42 AM