Lane Core thinks some "BIG News" is on the media horizon. Noting expressions of regret for not having been more critical of the president's WMD case before the war in both the New York Times and the Washington Post, Lane writes:
Yep. I think they know something we don't know, Faithful Reader. And they're not telling us. And they're going to question/impugn/downplay the news whenever it comes out. And they're offering their excuses now, ahead of time.
We'll see. I intend to be deliberately skeptical about any revelations, although I've never written off their possibility as so many of my fellow citizens even those who supported or still support the war seem to have done. Nonetheless, it's worth noting that their positioning has left a large number of Americans with reason to react to any news that their country was right to be resolved amid naysayers with excuses why being right isn't always right... or something.
I suspect that most will simply flip their rhetoric and continue along as if it had never changed. Those who've committed themselves in print, though, don't have that option.
Posted by Justin Katz at August 12, 2004 12:18 PMThanks for the notice. I think. ;-)
Posted by: ELC at August 12, 2004 1:46 PMLane,
Why the tentativeness? Did I fail to make it clear about whom I was talking?
Posted by: Justin Katz at August 12, 2004 1:51 PMNot at all. I wonder if I'm not taking a walk towards the wild side of kookiness there, and I don't feel very comfortable doing that. But, "What I have written, I have written." :-)
Posted by: ELC at August 12, 2004 3:34 PM
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |