Printer friendly version

August 12, 2004

Rolled (Taxpayer) Island

It begins to get frustratingly old — irrelevantly old for readers from elsewhere — but I think Rhode Islanders with any sort of platform at all are morally obligated to continue demanding governmental change. In this respect, the Providence Journal's editorial board continues to do what the American press was practically invented to do:

Rhode Island must face reality. It confronts a frightening downward spiral: higher taxes inflicted on the few who remain in Rhode Island, with educated children forced to move out to find jobs, and job creators steering clear in self-defense.

The new RIPEC study is far from the first warning Rhode Island has received. In June, the magazine Bloomberg Wealth Manager rated the Ocean State the worst in the nation -- of 50 states and the District of Columbia -- in punishing wealth. That advertises to those who might otherwise bring wealth (and jobs) to the Ocean State that they should avoid what the magazine called "tax-hell Rhode Island."

Meanwhile, the Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy rated Rhode Island fourth from the bottom in creating a climate in which free enterprise can flourish.

It is time for the Ocean State's leaders to respond to this problem by positioning the state so that it can aggressively compete with its neighbors for jobs. Those leaders must stop focusing on rewarding special interests and start worrying about the general interest -- and the taxpayers who keep the whole structure of government going.

In all likelihood, the politicians will not mend their ways until the voters drive them in that direction. The longer it takes, the worse off Rhode Island will be.

I've colored my town red on the map at the top of this post, which I found on Rhode Island's official tourism Web site. Newcomer rabble rouser that I am, I've pondered the necessary procedure to get the town to secede from the state. But running to Massachusetts presents its own considerations; I like Rhode Island; I believe that one ought to work to fix a place rather than abandon it; and the state can only improve from its current political condition.

Still, I hope I don't have to sell the house and move for less voluntary reasons than voting with my family's feet before my fellow citizens wake up from their Democrat daydreams.

(Note: I don't know whether the press was actually invented for this purpose, but it sounds good, doesn't it?)

Posted by Justin Katz at August 12, 2004 11:03 AM
Rhode Island
Comments

It's probably time to fold this state into Massachusetts or Connecticut. It's original purpose was to create a Catholic enclave away from Congregationalist Massachusetts. Now we don't have those kinds of problems, so we probably don't need such a small state.

Posted by: IB Bill at August 12, 2004 1:32 PM

Well, there historically have been a number of Catholics in Rhode Island. But it wasn't expressly created for that purpose - Roger Williams was always a Protestant, as was Anne Hutchinson and her small group on Aquidneck Island.

In fact, Roger Williams founded Providence in 1636. But the first Catholic masses weren't celebrated in RI until the 1780s. The colony was a place of relative religious tolerance - the first synagogue in North America still stands in Newport. But, one group that was rallied against by the early settlers of Rhode Island were the Catholics.

However, even if the enclave of Catholicism theory were true (and hey, I can't blame anyone for thinking it - there's a Catholic church on every corner) that would be no reason to dissolve the state now. It is a unique place with its own history, culture, and identity. Size doesn't always matter!

Yes, RI makes mistakes - I'm one of the many who are exiled because there are so few jobs in RI, and its such a poor climate for economic growth.

But I would sooner jump off the Big Blue Bug than see RI swallowed up by Massachusetts or Connecticut simply because they happen to be next door!

Posted by: Stacy at August 13, 2004 12:03 PM