(Click on the logo to return to the main blog.)

The Standard Piece Succeeded
11/20/2003

Do you want to know what's really notable about today's New York Times article about the Weekly Standard report about the Iraq–al Qaeda link? No, not that the Times used every method to discredit everybody along the chain that brought this information to the public. Rather, the part I've italicized here:

"If you don't understand how intelligence works, you could look at this memo and say, `Aha, there was an operational connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda,' " a Pentagon official said Wednesday. "But intelligence is about sorting what is credible from what isn't, and I think the best judgment about Iraq and Al Qaeda is that the jury is still out."

The public opinion jury had been back for quite a while. Now it's left the room again.

(Of course, that poor jury is getting a lot of exercise. As I've pointed out, in 1998, the Times reported the verdict in a headline: "US Government - Bin Laden and Iraq Agreed to Cooperate on Weapons Development.")

Posted by Justin Katz @ 11:11 AM EST